Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update
Trusted Local Realtor
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • we buy houses
    • sell your house fast
    • stop foreclosures
    • baltimore
    • Extra News
May 05.2025
2 Minutes Read

Why Builders Are Slamming the Brakes on New Apartments: Implications for Renters

Builders are slamming the brakes on new apartments, suburban duplex under clear sky.

The Multifamily Housing Market: Current Challenges

The multifamily housing market is facing unprecedented challenges as builders pull back significantly on new projects. A recent analysis from Redfin highlights a staggering 27.1% drop in multifamily building permits since their peak during the pandemic. At a time when demand is crucial, new apartment rentals enter the market at a crawl, raising countless concerns for renters and investors alike.

Why are Builders Slamming the Brakes?

Sheharyar Bokhari, a senior economist at Redfin, flags elevated interest rates as a primary culprit making new construction prohibitively expensive. When interest rates soar, borrowing costs inescapably climb, leaving builders wary of undertaking new multifamily projects. This caution is echoed by data from the U.S. Census Bureau which shows that, while the height of the pandemic saw an average of 17 permits filed per 10,000 residents, this figure has correctly fallen to only 12.4 permits. As costs rise, many builders are cutting back to avoid financial risks and slow growth.

The Toll of Tariffs and Material Costs

It's not just interest rates that are causing alarm. Builders now face increased costs for construction materials due to tariffs enacted during the previous administration. Combined with slackened rent growth, nearly two-thirds of the markets analyzed by Redfin are observing a decline in multifamily permitting activities since the pandemic. Particularly, dramatic drops have been noted in towns such as Stockton, California, where permitting hit a wall, and Colorado Springs, Colorado, which saw an 82% decline.

There are Still Bright Spots: The Silver Linings

Despite the widespread slowdown, some cities are bucking the trend and boosting construction. Oklahoma City has experienced a remarkable 193% increase in permits, signaling a robust demand amidst a downturn. Similarly, Austin, Texas, leads with 64.5 units permitted for every 10,000 residents, illustrating how certain urban dynamics, including remote work shifts that triggered surges in housing demand, sustain growth.

Future Implications for Renters

As construction slows down, the housing market faces the looming risk of a supply crunch. With fewer projects underway, renters could soon find themselves grappling with limited options and escalating prices. Redfin warns that if this trend persists, it may not just mean fewer units; it could also translate into a tighter market that pressures affordability.

Conclusion: What This Means for You

The multifamily market's contraction could lead to a tightening housing supply and rising rent prices. As a resident in a city facing these trends, it is crucial to stay informed about local housing developments and potential shifts in rental costs. By keeping a pulse on market conditions, you can prepare for upcoming changes and ensure you're making the best housing decisions in an uncertain environment.

Extra News

0 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
11.12.2025

Why Trump's 50-Year Mortgage Plan Is a Hazardous Gamble for Homebuyers

Update A Controversial Proposal: Why 50-Year Mortgages Might Not Be the AnswerThe Trump administration's recent push to introduce 50-year mortgages has created a considerable stir within the real estate and financial sectors. While the proposal aims to improve affordability for homebuyers in a strained housing market, experts caution that it may be a misguided move, potentially hindering, rather than helping, the path to homeownership.Shorter Terms: The Better Choice for BorrowersMortgage professionals agree: shorter loan terms generally offer better financial terms for buyers. A standard 30-year mortgage leads to quicker principal repayment and benefits in terms of lower total interest paid over the life of the loan. John Downs from Vellum Mortgage notes that a 50-year mortgage would mean borrowers pay more annual interest and build less equity over time—a point echoed by multiple analysts.The Irony of Lower PaymentsAt first glance, a longer mortgage term appears attractive because it can lower monthly payments, easing the financial strain on homebuyers. For instance, consider a $415,000 home. A 30-year mortgage at a fixed rate of 6.22% costs roughly $2,038 monthly. In contrast, a 50-year term could reduce that to about $1,802. However, buyers must brace for almost double the long-term costs, with significantly more allocated towards interest over 50 years. This is a financial burden that many can expect to carry well into their retirement years.Experts Say: A Band-Aid SolutionThe criticism surrounding the 50-year mortgage proposal isn’t limited to financial implications alone. Many commentators have labeled it a 'band-aid'—a superficial fix for a deeper issue. Troy Ludtka, senior economist at SMBC Nikko Securities America, emphasized that merely adjusting the mortgage term is not the core challenge that needs addressing. Instead, the focus should be on increasing the housing supply to combat the escalating prices and housing shortages affecting millions across the country.Potential Scarcity of Traditional OwnershipCritics also have raised concerns that extending mortgage terms could erode the traditional view of home ownership—an opportunity to build wealth and equity over time. Christopher Rufo, a commentator on housing issues, has pointed out the shift from perceiving housing as a long-term investment to viewing it as a speculative asset. The risk here is that capitalizing on longer terms could jeopardize the financial stability that comes with traditional ownership norms.Conclusion: What Homebuyers Should ConsiderThe discussion surrounding 50-year mortgages serves as an important reminder of the complexities nestled within the financial landscape. While the allure of lower payments may appeal in the immediate term, potential homebuyers should consider the long-term ramifications on their finances and home equity. Consulting with financial experts, evaluating personal circumstances, and weighing all mortgage options can provide clarity amid these shifting discussions.

11.11.2025

Zillow's Broker Kickbacks Lawsuit: What Homebuyers Should Know

Update Understanding Zillow's Latest Legal Troubles Zillow, one of the most recognized names in real estate, is facing yet another class-action lawsuit, filed on November 7, 2025, in Washington District Court. The lawsuit draws attention to Zillow's Premier Agent program, accusing the company of allegedly engaging in unethical practices by requiring agents to meet certain mortgage pre-approval quotas to maintain access to valuable leads. This scenario paints a troubling picture of conflict of interest for agents who are supposed to act in the best interest of their clients. Allegations: A Closer Look at the Claims The plaintiffs claim that Zillow is violating the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and the Washington Consumer Protection Act, jeopardizing the fiduciary duties that real estate agents owe to their clients. The crux of the complaint resides in the assertion that agents are effectively being coerced into funneling clients towards Zillow Home Loans, a practice that not only impacts agent trustworthiness but also the options available to homebuyers. The lawsuit names Araba Armstrong, a first-time homebuyer from Alaska, as the lead plaintiff. Armstrong alleges that she felt pressured to use Zillow’s financing services, a sentiment echoed frequently among consumers who rely on real estate brokers for unbiased guidance. The Implications for Consumers and Agents One of the most concerning aspects of this ongoing saga is the potential impact on homebuyers. Those relying on real estate agents for impartial assistance may find themselves steering towards mortgages that may not offer the best rates or terms. By mandating these pre-approval quotas, Zillow's policies appear to turn its agents into salespeople for its own loan products rather than giving clients the broad, impartial advice they need during such a critical financial decision. Zillow’s Push for a “Super App” Further complicating matters is Zillow's broader vision of becoming a comprehensive “super app” that integrates every aspect of the home-buying process. This ambition, while innovative, raises serious questions about the ethical boundaries of such a platform. As Zillow expands its reach, can consumers be assured that their best interests will remain a priority, or will they simply become cogs in a machine designed to drive revenue for Zillow? Context: Previous Legal Challenges This recent lawsuit is not Zillow's only legal woe. In September 2025, a different class-action suit was filed against the company over its Flex agent tactics, which similarly accused it of inflating costs for consumers. These lawsuits reflect growing scrutiny over Zillow’s business practices, highlighting a contentious tension within the real estate industry. A Community Perspective on Real Estate and Trust For many homebuyers and sellers, real estate transactions are deeply personal. The emotional stress combined with significant financial implications makes trust between agents and clients essential. When that trust is compromised, as the lawsuit suggests, it can substantially impact community stability and relationships. Understanding the potential ramifications of these practices encourages buyers and sellers alike to be more diligent in their choices. This unfolding legal drama beckons us to examine our roles in this interconnected community, asking us to seek out transparency and integrity in real estate dealings. As stakeholders, consumers must demand clarity and fair practices in the marketplace.

11.08.2025

Navigating Credit Score Changes: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Behind the Curve

Update Understanding the Delay in Credit Score Adoption Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, pivotal players in the U.S. housing finance system, are caught in a web of complexities as they navigate the acceptance of more inclusive credit scoring models. In July, Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte announced an intention to embrace VantageScore 4.0 immediately, a model designed to assess credit risk more inclusively. However, the announcement was met with industry surprise, given previous changes that had been rolled back. Today, lenders might find themselves perplexed as they anticipate the rollout of these new scoring guidelines. Why the Transition is Complicated The adoption of VantageScore 4.0 isn't just a simple switch. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac face numerous technical challenges in integrating this new model. Historical data and loan-level price adjustments (LLPAs)—necessary for lenders to assess risk accurately—are key components still pending. Currently, lenders are waiting on LLPAs tailored for VantageScore 4.0, which are expected to be released no sooner than late 2026. Additionally, while FICO Score 10 T has been generating concern among lenders due to rising costs and a lack of historical data, it adds to the anxiety surrounding credit evaluation reforms. The Implications for Homebuyers The ultimate goal of shifting to more inclusive credit models like VantageScore 4.0 is to enhance access to homeownership for millions of Americans. The FHFA projects that the implementation of this credit model could facilitate up to $1 trillion in new, high-quality mortgages and provide up to five million prospective buyers an opportunity to qualify for homeownership. However, current uncertainties mean many may still face hurdles on this journey. Revolutionizing Mortgage Lending As stated by VantageScore's leadership, the updated model eliminates unnecessary requirements that frequently disqualified borrowers, such as the obligation for recent credit activity. These inclusive measures, expected to allow for a more accurate assessment of financial behaviors—including rental and utility payments—could transform the traditional lending landscape, allowing previously underserved populations to access loans. Counterarguments To Integration Yet, the push to transition isn’t without criticism. Some industry leaders argue that pushing for these new models could undermine the established FICO scoring model, leading to an undefined competitive disadvantage for Fair Isaac, the firm behind FICO scores. The concerns that an abrupt shift may exacerbate competition difficulties in the credit scoring realm highlight the contentious atmosphere surrounding the proposed changes. Looking Ahead: The Future of Credit Scoring As we approach the conclusion of 2023, it’s clear that the future of credit scoring in the mortgage industry is rife with challenges and opportunities alike. For borrowers eager for inclusivity, the wait may be frustrating, but it is essential to ensure a smooth transition that balances risk and access. Continued dialogue and transparency in how these scoring models are implemented will play a crucial role in shaping a more equitable lending future. The transition to inclusive credit models marks a critical evolution in addressing systemic inequities in home lending. As developments unfold, the hope remains that newer scoring systems will pave the way for a more inclusive narrative in the mortgage market.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*